In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, the decision between electric vehicles (EVs) and petrol cars hinges on a nuanced understanding of their strengths and weaknesses. While EVs boast compelling environmental benefits with zero tailpipe emissions and lower running costs, their upfront purchase price and extended charging times can be deterrents. Conversely, petrol cars offer affordability and swift refueling, yet come saddled with a higher environmental impact and escalating running costs over time.

EVs present a compelling option for the environmentally conscious driver with a focus on long-term savings. However, those prioritizing immediate affordability and convenient refueling may find petrol cars more suitable. Ultimately, the optimal choice rests on carefully evaluating individual needs, budgetary constraints, and environmental responsibility.

WVCs are a serious problem that affects both humans and animals. Animals rely on migration corridors to find food, water, and mates. Roads can intersect these corridors, forcing animals to cross them, which can lead to collisions.

There are an estimated 300,000 WVCs per year in the USA. These collisions can cause injury or death to humans, and they can also be expensive. The average cost of colliding with an elk is $25,319, and the average cost of colliding with a deer is $8,190.

Some states are taking action to try to reduce WVCs. These actions include building wildlife crossings, such as bridges and underpasses, and conserving habitat connectivity. Wildlife crossings can help animals to cross roads safely.

© NCEL (National Caucus of Environmental Legislators)